History 17:
Fall 2008, TH
6:00 - 9:05 p.m., Ced 1 Instructor: Shannon Van Zant
Office Hours:
Tamarack 209, cubicle G, Th 5 - 6p Email:
vanzants@yosemite.edu
Course Description:
Course Objectives: By the end of this course you should be able
to identify, think analytically about and critically evaluate major issues in
U.S. History. You should also understand
the nature of historical argumentation, and be able to communicate your thoughts
and ideas in a coherent and confident manner, both orally and in writing. This course is designed to strengthen your
critical and analytical thinking and writing skills.
Course Assignments: This course is worth 700 points. The grades for this course will be based on
three exams, three papers and three readings notes and outlines. The specifics of these assignments are
discussed separately. No late papers or
make-up exams will be accepted but assignments may be turned in early.
2
exams @ 100 pts = 200 pts A: 630 - 700
1
final exam @ 200 pts = 200 pts B: 560 - 629
3
2
papers @ 50 pts = 100 pts D: 420 - 489
1
final paper @ 100 pts = 100 pts F: â 419
*The Grading Criteria for these assignments is
attached to this syllabus.
Required
1) Brinkley,
Alan. American History: A Survey
Volume II, 12th edition.
McGraw Hill, 2006.
2) Davidson
and Lytle. After the Fact: The Art of Historical
Detection Volume II, 5th edition. McGraw Hill, 2005.
3) Hoffman
and Gjerde. Major Problems in American History: Volume II Since 1865. Houghton Mifflin, 2002.
Classroom Policies: Please be respectful. Come to class on time, prepared with all
materials and ready to work. Needless to
say, this is not a place to sleep or eat.
Plagiarism will not be tolerated and will result in a failing grade, so
be sure you do your own work and cite the work and ideas of others. I do not accept late work and do not give
make-up exams. I do not take attendance,
but your attendance and class participation will be reflected in your work, and
so it is critical that you attend class. For students with disabilities,
whether physical, learning, or psychological in nature, who believe that they
may need special accommodations in this class, I encourage you to discuss
options with me within the first 10 days of instruction.
*Please visit the Geography/History/Political
Science Department website at http://www.gocolumbia.org/
for some useful links.
Course Schedule:
|
Date |
Assignment |
Date |
Assignment |
|
Aug 28 |
|
Oct 23 |
All
Materials Due By 8:00 a.m. |
|
Sept 4 |
|
Oct 30 |
Exam 2
Assigned |
|
Sept 11 |
Paper
1 DUE |
Nov 6 |
Exam
2 Due |
|
Sept 18 |
All
materials DUE By 8:00 a.m. |
Nov 13 |
|
|
Sept 25 |
Exam 1 assigned |
Nov 20 |
Final
Paper DUE |
|
Oct 2 |
Exam
1 DUE |
Nov 27 |
No Class |
|
Oct 9 |
|
Dec 4 |
All
Materials Due By 8:00 a.m. |
|
Oct 16 |
Paper
2 DUE |
Dec 11 |
FINAL
EXAM 6-8p.m. |
1st
Thursday, Sept. 18th
– All materials DUE
E Thursday,
Sept. 25th – 1st exam assigned
X Thursday,
Oct 2nd – 1st exam
DUE
A Preparation:
Brinkley Chapters 15 - 23 ; Major Problems Chapters 1 – 6;
M After the Fact Chapters Prologue - 9
2nd Thursday,
Oct. 23rd – All materials DUE
E Thursday,
Oct. 30th – 2nd exam assigned
X Thursday,
Nov. 6th – 2nd
exam DUE
A Preparation:
Brinkley Chapters 24 – 29; Major Problems Chapters 7 – 11;
M After the Fact Chapters 10 - 14
FINAL Thursday,
December 4th – All materials
DUE
E
X Thursday,
December 11th – Final Exam Assigned & DUE
A Preparation:
Brinkley Chapters 30 – 34; Major Problems Chapters 12 – 15;
M After the Fact Chapters 15 – 17
Description of Papers
The three papers to be written will be based on
your readings from Major Problems. They are designed to help you identify an
author’s argument and the evidence used to develop their
argument. The paper will be a comparative
analysis of the two historians’ work on a similar argument at the end of
each chapter. You will choose one
chapter and analyze the historians essay at the end of the chapter. Each paper should clearly identify each
author’s thesis and their supporting evidence.
A comparison or contrast should be made of the author’s
arguments. Do they agree on the topic? Do they support their position well? How do they support it? Which argument is most convincing and
why? This is not a personal opinion paper. The goal is to get you to recognize and
identify and argument and critically analyze its merits and faults. The first two papers are worth 50 points each,
and the final paper is worth 100 points.
Paper 1: Major Problems choose one chapter from Ch. 1 – 6. 50 pts Due:
Sept 11
Paper 2: Major Problems choose one chapter from Ch. 7 – 11 50 pts Due: Oct 16
Final Paper:
Major Problems choose one
chapter from Ch. 12 - 15 100 pts
Due: Nov 20
All papers are to be typed, double-spaced with
12-inch font and one-inch margins.
Please only include a cover sheet – no costly portfolios. The length of the paper is not as important
as the quality of work. I will grade you
work according to the Grading Criteria, and not according to how much you
write. If you are uncomfortable with this,
please come and see me. If you have any
questions on the format of the papers or what is expected of you, please
ask. It is very likely that you are not
the only one that has questions. This is
your education, please treat it as such.
GRADING CRITERIA FOR PAPERS
1. Is there
a concise thesis, a coherent progression of ideas, and a conclusion that
accurately sums up your paper?
2. Did you
state all parts of the author’s thesis?
3. Did you
develop all points and ideas equally?
Did you leave anything out?
4. Were the
examples or illustrations you used the best available? Did they come from the appropriate reading
material?
5. Did you
sufficiently analyze the arguments, not just the contents?
6. Did you
compare and contrast the author’s arguments?
7. Are there
mechanical problems, i.e. spelling, grammar, fragments, etc.?
8. Are all
sources used and cited – required readings (MP), class discussions, and your
own critique?
9. Are there
factual inaccuracies?
10. Does
this represent something that could be used to teach others?
Description of Exams:
The first two exams are take home exams worth 100
points each. The final exam may be a
take home exam, and is worth 200 points.
All exams will be in essay form.
The exams are designed to enhance your critical thinking and writing
skills. It will be necessary for you to select,
organize and present material from the reading, class notes, and your own
ideas. All sources used should be
cited. Plagiarism will result in a
failing grade.
The exam will be assigned the class period before
it is due, except for the final which will be assigned at the beginning of the
final exam period. If the class fails
to have any further questions, the exam will be assigned that day. If all materials are approved before the due
date, you will be able to choose which exam question you would like to
answer. All exams are due at the
beginning of the class following the date assigned. I do not give make-up exams or accept late
papers. The exam questions for all three
exams are included with the syllabus.
Please look them over carefully and ask any questions you may have.
All exams are to be typed, double-spaced with
12-inch font and one-inch margins.
Please only include a cover sheet – no costly portfolios. The length of the paper is not as important
as the quality of work. I will grade you
work according to the Grading Criteria, and not according to how much you
write. If you are uncomfortable with
this, please come and see me. If you
have any questions on the format of the papers or what is expected of
you, please ask. It is very likely that
you are not the only one that has questions.
This is your education, please treat it as such.
NO EXAMS WILL BE ASSIGNED or ACCEPTED VIA EMAIL!
GRADING CRITERIA FOR EXAMS
1. Is there
a concise thesis, a coherent progression of ideas, and a conclusion that
accurately sums up your paper?
2. Did you
answer all parts of the question and all that was implied by the question?
3. Did you
develop all points and ideas equally?
Did you leave anything out?
4. Were the
examples or illustrations you used the best available to demonstrate the
validity of your ideas? Did they come
from the appropriate reading material?
5. Did you
include visual aids to enhance the points of your argument, i.e. maps, charts,
photographs?
6. Do all of
your examples support your thesis?
7. Are there
mechanical problems, i.e. spelling, grammar, fragments, etc.?
8. Are all
sources used and cited – required readings, class discussions, and your own
critique?
9. Are there
factual inaccuracies?
10. Does
this represent something that could be used to teach others?
Your readings, notes and outlines for each of the
exam questions, must be approved by the instructor by the due date in
order to receive choice on the exam questions.
The readings, notes and outlines of the first two exams are worth 25 pts
each and the final readings, notes and outlines are worth 50 pts. If you do not get the material in by the due
date an exam question will be assigned to you at the end of the class period
before the exam is due. For the final
exam, if you do not get your materials in before the due date, the final exam
question will be assigned at the beginning of the final period, and the exam
will be written in class.
The readings consist of the reading you do with the
required sources. You should bring these
materials to each and every class, and use them. I will be checking these materials to ensure
that you are reading, and reading effectively.
This provides a great opportunity to discuss reading strategies and
identify any problems with the required readings.
The notes consist of the notes that you take in
class, or outside of class. I will be
checking your notes to ensure that you are taking effective notes, and that
your notes will be useful to you.
The outlines will be of the exam questions. I expect you to outline each exam
question, including citing sources and thesis statements. These outlines will be crucial to writing a
good exam.
These readings, notes and outlines can be turned in
any time before the due date, and may be turned in multiple times. So plan ahead, and don’t procrastinate.
Exam 1 Questions
1877-1920
Guidelines:
· Use the Grading Criteria
· Graphic Presentations are required
· Include one-third readings, one-third class dialogue, one-third original
thoughts (not opinion)
· Cite all sources including class dialogue and readings
· Do not procrastinate. You may
turn exams in early.
Exam 2 Questions
1920-1960
Guidelines:
· Use the Grading Criteria
· Graphic Presentations are required
· Include one-third readings, one-third class dialogue, one-third original
thoughts (not opinion)
· Cite all sources including class dialogue and readings
· Do not procrastinate. You may
turn exams in early.
Final Exam Questions
1960-2008
Guidelines:
· Use the Grading Criteria
· Graphic Presentations are required
· Include one-third readings, one-third class dialogue, one-third original
thoughts (not opinion)
· Cite all sources including class dialogue and readings
· Do not procrastinate. You may
turn exams in early.